Antisemitism refuses to die. I wish it would. It's even more grievous when it's perpetuated by Christians, of all people.
https://mosaicmagazine.com/response/politics-current-affairs/2023/06/unchurched-christians-and-anti-semitic-ones/
Random and disjointed ponderings on faith, life, culture and professional issues (occasionally).
Showing posts with label Church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Church. Show all posts
Sunday, June 25, 2023
Unpleasant to think about
Sunday, January 07, 2018
Holy is his name
I picked up this postcard at a church over the weekend. As you can see, it is a painting of Mary holding the baby Jesus. Mary looks uncannily like actress, Natalie Portman, in costume as Padme from the Star Wars prequels. Unfortunately, both mother and child look Caucasian in appearance, and not even slightly Jewish. Presumably, the artist wasn't going for historical accuracy.
Labels:
Christianity,
Church,
Jesus Christ,
Mary,
Postcards,
Star Wars
Monday, October 10, 2016
Counterproductive
One minor political party campaigned in the recent Australian federal election on the snappy three-word slogan of "Tax the church." This appealed to voters wanting to use punish the church for its moral failings, and looking for simplistic answers to the government's financial problems.
Natasha Moore of the Centre for Public Christianity argues her case well, in favour of retaining the present tax arrangements for religious organisations.
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/churches-arent-business-and-they-still-deserve-a-tax-break-20161007-grxntr
Natasha Moore of the Centre for Public Christianity argues her case well, in favour of retaining the present tax arrangements for religious organisations.
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/churches-arent-business-and-they-still-deserve-a-tax-break-20161007-grxntr
Thursday, April 17, 2014
Bludging
This is another curio I came across whilst sorting through some donations at work. For the uninitiated, sometimes in churches childrens' ministry workers dress up as clowns to engage with children, hence the need for this pamphlet. Mind you, there's plenty of clowns in church pulpits these days or in televangelism. The only difference is that they don't wear a zany costume, red nose, or theatrical grease paint.
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Coming soon to Australia?
Same sex marriage campaigners, such as Australian Greens MP, Adam Bandt, have long attempted to placate religious opponents of same sex marriage who are concerned about how such reforms will impact upon the churches. Bandt said that his private member's bill, introduced to the Federal Parliament earlier in the year, contained provisions to protect members of the clergy from being penalized if they declined to perform same sex marriages.
Our friends across the Tasman Sea are also debating this issue, and according to a recently obtained legal opinion, if same sex marriage becomes legal, all marriage celebrants, church elders, leaders, photographers, caterers and any other person or entity supplying services to the public will be forced to be involved in such weddings, or be in violation of human rights legislation.
Despite Bandt's platitudes, there is no reason to think that the same situation will eventuate in Australia if same sex marriage advocates achieve their aims. In the eyes of some elements of society, it is unfashionable to be a theologically conservative Christian. Soon it may very well become illegal.
Our friends across the Tasman Sea are also debating this issue, and according to a recently obtained legal opinion, if same sex marriage becomes legal, all marriage celebrants, church elders, leaders, photographers, caterers and any other person or entity supplying services to the public will be forced to be involved in such weddings, or be in violation of human rights legislation.
Despite Bandt's platitudes, there is no reason to think that the same situation will eventuate in Australia if same sex marriage advocates achieve their aims. In the eyes of some elements of society, it is unfashionable to be a theologically conservative Christian. Soon it may very well become illegal.
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Think a little
WHY DO PEOPLE LEAVE CHURCHES
This article by Dr Richard Hibbert came from the Australian Prayer Network. Dr Hibbert is Head of the Sydney Missionary Bible College's School of Cross-Cultural Mission. He is a medical doctor who has served as a missionary with WEC in the Middle East and Europe, working among Muslim people. He has a Doctor of Missiology from Columbia Seminary in Georgia, and a PhD through Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Chicago. Why have I posted it here? It's fair to say that during this Christmas season, the thoughts of many Australians who may be unchurched turn to spiritual things. Also, occasionally I read militant atheist blogs which attempt to argue that there is a correlation between the growth of their movement and the decline in church membership and attendance. As Dr Hibbert shows below, the situation is more complex than that. The fact is that leaving the church does not always mean abandoning the Christian faith as well.
It's safe to say that the vast majority of Australian churches have experienced the pain of having someone leave their gathering. At your church, it might have been someone who was moving out of the area or into a new phase of life - or, tragically, someone who has fallen away from Christ. But why do people really leave churches in Australia or in mission contexts?
I conducted a case study in Bulgaria to find out some of the reasons why people leave - and to pull together some of the lessons we can learn as God's people. From the late 1980s to the mid-1990s, and especially immediately following the fall of Communism, thousands of previously Muslim, Turkish-speaking Roma in Bulgaria began to believe in Jesus. These Roma people are known as 'Millet'. In this period, the number of Millet churches grew from less than five to approximately 100 with an estimated 10,000 Millet church attendees.
A. Sadly, the dramatic multiplication of Millet believers and churches was followed by an equally dramatic decline in the number of Millet church attendees in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
B. Stagnation and decline in the number of churches and church attendees have often been observed following periods of rapid church planting and multiplication. Missiologists have suggested a wide variety of reasons for this phenomena of 'cooling off', including a lack of leadership or of a contextualised pattern of leadership, poor patterns of communication and/or conflict within the church, failure to nurture new Christians, lack of meaningful rituals and structures of incorporation into the church, and the natural entropy common to all human institutions.
C. But establishing the specific reasons for decline in a particular context is an important step in addressing decline and working towards future growth. The literature on defection from churches and other religious groups offers a range of possible explanations for people leaving churches. For example, Jorge Gomez's excellent 1995 study of people leaving evangelical churches in Costa Rica identifies several main reasons for defection which are relevant to the Millet experience: sinful conduct by some church leaders, the misuse of money in churches, defectors' sense of shame about their lifestyle not matching the standards of the gospel, and pressure from family and friends.
At the same time, many studies suggest that deficiencies in the process of conversion can be associated with defections. These deficiencies might include a lack of meaningful ritual to demonstrate conversion or to signal incorporation into the church, insufficient development of social interaction with church members, and motivations for conversion that are primarily utilitarian without sufficient understanding of the full meaning of the gospel. Another important reason for leaving that is raised by many studies is the inability of newcomers to develop and maintain strong, satisfying bonds with church members and pastors.
D. But what were the significant factors behind the Millet church's stagnation and decline? During late 2007 and early 2008, I visited several Millet neighbourhoods and spent a few weeks interviewing people who had left Turkish-speaking Millet churches ('leavers') as well as people who had stayed in churches ('stayers'). The leavers I interviewed gave four main reasons for leaving: Being hurt by or disillusioned with their pastor or group of pastors; Lack of time due to work or other commitments, which in each case seemed to be a cover for actions they or others considered sinful and shameful; Opposition from husbands; Conflict with another believer.
By far the most frequently cited reason for leaving was being hurt by or disillusioned with church leaders. Leaders making unilateral decisions, misusing money, fighting among themselves, failing to visit when the leaver had a problem, or insulting, shaming, or offending the leaver or their family: all of these leadership behaviours were highlighted as being hurtful or disillusioning for defectors. Indeed, the prominence of leader-related reasons for defection corresponds with the findings of many church growth studies. Problems of church leadership are often associated with decline.
E: Having said that, my interviews with stayers revealed that support from other believers was absolutely central to keeping Millet at church. Half of the stayers I interviewed described times when they nearly or actually gave up believing in Jesus or going to church temporarily. Support from other believers - whether in the form of verbal encouragement, prayer, or home visits - was the factor most frequently mentioned as helping these Millet to stay at or return to church.
This accords with the findings of Allen Swanson's 1986 study of Taiwanese believers and those of Arthur Duck's 2001 study of Brazilian churches. Each study revealed that support from other believers was a key factor associated with church members staying in their churches. One of the most striking findings of this study was that all the leavers, except for one, still expressed belief in Jesus and continued to pray regularly.
How does this study help us to know why people leave churches, and what we can do about it? There are several key implications here for missionaries and local Christians.
1. Don't assume that those who have left the church have also left the faith. Almost all of the twenty Millet interviewees who had left the church still believed in Jesus as their Lord and Saviour. They missed the church, and they wanted to be back in fellowship with the community of believers. Given their continuing love for the Lord and for his people, it is likely that they could be gathered again into existing or new churches. Studies suggest that in Western contexts, including Australia, many who have left churches have also not left their faith in Christ. Many of them may also be 'gatherable'.
2. While most Millet defectors were positive about the thought of returning to church, they were prevented from doing so by a sense of sin or shame. Overcoming this barrier, in the Millet context, requires church members and/or leaders to intentionally reach out to the defectors. Visiting defectors in their homes will be the most effective way of doing this. Home visits should be one of the most important activities for Millet churches, since such visits, along with prayer and encouragement, led many Millet who had temporarily stopped coming to church to return.
In other contexts, too, current church members or leaders would do well to visit people who have recently left the church - in the West, many who have left churches are discouraged by the church's failure to pursue them.
3. People leave churches for many reasons, but many continue to believe in Jesus and live for him. For the Millet, the primary issue is poor leadership. In other contexts, other reasons are likely to predominate. Finding out why church leavers have left is crucial if we are to develop context-specific strategies for preventing defection and for helping defectors to return to church. The best way to do this is to sensitively ask the leavers themselves.
As Stuart Murray points out, some church leavers "have abandoned their Christian faith; but many have abandoned only church", and therefore, "Leavers have insights and perspectives that can sensitise churches to issues that hinder witness and community life - and that may prompt others to consider leaving". Having learnt church leavers' reasons for leaving, it is critical that churches evaluate their own practices and change to address the problems. If your church wants to begin this evaluation process, you could begin with the list of reasons for leaving given above alongside the specific reasons for leaving given by leavers in your context.
4. Many church growth studies implicate poor leadership as a cause for church decline. Church leadership must be transparent, accountable, and culturally relevant. A major problem in mission contexts is that the expatriate missionaries impose their own inherited forms of church leadership and administration on local churches without realising that these may be counterproductive according to the values of the local culture.
Sometimes the inherited forms are very difficult to let go of as they are thought to be inherently 'Christian' rather than simply one cultural expression of worship and church practice among many possible options. The missional principle here is work with the culture, not against it. The only way to do this is to seriously research both the culture and the Bible, being willing to let go of 'the way we've always done things' for the sake of finding culturally relevant expressions of biblical principles. This kind of research needs to involve local people in an empowering dialogue.
5. Christian community is not primarily a meeting: it is a sharing of life together as an expression of our shared identity in Christ. It includes a sense of belonging to one another because we belong to God. The processes of entering and leaving the community of a local church hold great potential for nurturing a sense of belonging and shared identity, so it is important that churches mark the incorporation of new members into their group with special events or celebrations, including baptism. By the same token, when people leave the community of the local church, they should not be abandoned - pathways should be constructed which help them to come back into fellowship with the church they have left or with another local church.
Source: Dr Richard Hibbert
This article by Dr Richard Hibbert came from the Australian Prayer Network. Dr Hibbert is Head of the Sydney Missionary Bible College's School of Cross-Cultural Mission. He is a medical doctor who has served as a missionary with WEC in the Middle East and Europe, working among Muslim people. He has a Doctor of Missiology from Columbia Seminary in Georgia, and a PhD through Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Chicago. Why have I posted it here? It's fair to say that during this Christmas season, the thoughts of many Australians who may be unchurched turn to spiritual things. Also, occasionally I read militant atheist blogs which attempt to argue that there is a correlation between the growth of their movement and the decline in church membership and attendance. As Dr Hibbert shows below, the situation is more complex than that. The fact is that leaving the church does not always mean abandoning the Christian faith as well.
It's safe to say that the vast majority of Australian churches have experienced the pain of having someone leave their gathering. At your church, it might have been someone who was moving out of the area or into a new phase of life - or, tragically, someone who has fallen away from Christ. But why do people really leave churches in Australia or in mission contexts?
I conducted a case study in Bulgaria to find out some of the reasons why people leave - and to pull together some of the lessons we can learn as God's people. From the late 1980s to the mid-1990s, and especially immediately following the fall of Communism, thousands of previously Muslim, Turkish-speaking Roma in Bulgaria began to believe in Jesus. These Roma people are known as 'Millet'. In this period, the number of Millet churches grew from less than five to approximately 100 with an estimated 10,000 Millet church attendees.
A. Sadly, the dramatic multiplication of Millet believers and churches was followed by an equally dramatic decline in the number of Millet church attendees in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
B. Stagnation and decline in the number of churches and church attendees have often been observed following periods of rapid church planting and multiplication. Missiologists have suggested a wide variety of reasons for this phenomena of 'cooling off', including a lack of leadership or of a contextualised pattern of leadership, poor patterns of communication and/or conflict within the church, failure to nurture new Christians, lack of meaningful rituals and structures of incorporation into the church, and the natural entropy common to all human institutions.
C. But establishing the specific reasons for decline in a particular context is an important step in addressing decline and working towards future growth. The literature on defection from churches and other religious groups offers a range of possible explanations for people leaving churches. For example, Jorge Gomez's excellent 1995 study of people leaving evangelical churches in Costa Rica identifies several main reasons for defection which are relevant to the Millet experience: sinful conduct by some church leaders, the misuse of money in churches, defectors' sense of shame about their lifestyle not matching the standards of the gospel, and pressure from family and friends.
At the same time, many studies suggest that deficiencies in the process of conversion can be associated with defections. These deficiencies might include a lack of meaningful ritual to demonstrate conversion or to signal incorporation into the church, insufficient development of social interaction with church members, and motivations for conversion that are primarily utilitarian without sufficient understanding of the full meaning of the gospel. Another important reason for leaving that is raised by many studies is the inability of newcomers to develop and maintain strong, satisfying bonds with church members and pastors.
D. But what were the significant factors behind the Millet church's stagnation and decline? During late 2007 and early 2008, I visited several Millet neighbourhoods and spent a few weeks interviewing people who had left Turkish-speaking Millet churches ('leavers') as well as people who had stayed in churches ('stayers'). The leavers I interviewed gave four main reasons for leaving: Being hurt by or disillusioned with their pastor or group of pastors; Lack of time due to work or other commitments, which in each case seemed to be a cover for actions they or others considered sinful and shameful; Opposition from husbands; Conflict with another believer.
By far the most frequently cited reason for leaving was being hurt by or disillusioned with church leaders. Leaders making unilateral decisions, misusing money, fighting among themselves, failing to visit when the leaver had a problem, or insulting, shaming, or offending the leaver or their family: all of these leadership behaviours were highlighted as being hurtful or disillusioning for defectors. Indeed, the prominence of leader-related reasons for defection corresponds with the findings of many church growth studies. Problems of church leadership are often associated with decline.
E: Having said that, my interviews with stayers revealed that support from other believers was absolutely central to keeping Millet at church. Half of the stayers I interviewed described times when they nearly or actually gave up believing in Jesus or going to church temporarily. Support from other believers - whether in the form of verbal encouragement, prayer, or home visits - was the factor most frequently mentioned as helping these Millet to stay at or return to church.
This accords with the findings of Allen Swanson's 1986 study of Taiwanese believers and those of Arthur Duck's 2001 study of Brazilian churches. Each study revealed that support from other believers was a key factor associated with church members staying in their churches. One of the most striking findings of this study was that all the leavers, except for one, still expressed belief in Jesus and continued to pray regularly.
How does this study help us to know why people leave churches, and what we can do about it? There are several key implications here for missionaries and local Christians.
1. Don't assume that those who have left the church have also left the faith. Almost all of the twenty Millet interviewees who had left the church still believed in Jesus as their Lord and Saviour. They missed the church, and they wanted to be back in fellowship with the community of believers. Given their continuing love for the Lord and for his people, it is likely that they could be gathered again into existing or new churches. Studies suggest that in Western contexts, including Australia, many who have left churches have also not left their faith in Christ. Many of them may also be 'gatherable'.
2. While most Millet defectors were positive about the thought of returning to church, they were prevented from doing so by a sense of sin or shame. Overcoming this barrier, in the Millet context, requires church members and/or leaders to intentionally reach out to the defectors. Visiting defectors in their homes will be the most effective way of doing this. Home visits should be one of the most important activities for Millet churches, since such visits, along with prayer and encouragement, led many Millet who had temporarily stopped coming to church to return.
In other contexts, too, current church members or leaders would do well to visit people who have recently left the church - in the West, many who have left churches are discouraged by the church's failure to pursue them.
3. People leave churches for many reasons, but many continue to believe in Jesus and live for him. For the Millet, the primary issue is poor leadership. In other contexts, other reasons are likely to predominate. Finding out why church leavers have left is crucial if we are to develop context-specific strategies for preventing defection and for helping defectors to return to church. The best way to do this is to sensitively ask the leavers themselves.
As Stuart Murray points out, some church leavers "have abandoned their Christian faith; but many have abandoned only church", and therefore, "Leavers have insights and perspectives that can sensitise churches to issues that hinder witness and community life - and that may prompt others to consider leaving". Having learnt church leavers' reasons for leaving, it is critical that churches evaluate their own practices and change to address the problems. If your church wants to begin this evaluation process, you could begin with the list of reasons for leaving given above alongside the specific reasons for leaving given by leavers in your context.
4. Many church growth studies implicate poor leadership as a cause for church decline. Church leadership must be transparent, accountable, and culturally relevant. A major problem in mission contexts is that the expatriate missionaries impose their own inherited forms of church leadership and administration on local churches without realising that these may be counterproductive according to the values of the local culture.
Sometimes the inherited forms are very difficult to let go of as they are thought to be inherently 'Christian' rather than simply one cultural expression of worship and church practice among many possible options. The missional principle here is work with the culture, not against it. The only way to do this is to seriously research both the culture and the Bible, being willing to let go of 'the way we've always done things' for the sake of finding culturally relevant expressions of biblical principles. This kind of research needs to involve local people in an empowering dialogue.
5. Christian community is not primarily a meeting: it is a sharing of life together as an expression of our shared identity in Christ. It includes a sense of belonging to one another because we belong to God. The processes of entering and leaving the community of a local church hold great potential for nurturing a sense of belonging and shared identity, so it is important that churches mark the incorporation of new members into their group with special events or celebrations, including baptism. By the same token, when people leave the community of the local church, they should not be abandoned - pathways should be constructed which help them to come back into fellowship with the church they have left or with another local church.
Source: Dr Richard Hibbert
Thursday, May 03, 2007
A tale of two churches
I found out about Crossway Moreland through its website, so towards the middle of last year I visited there one Sunday morning to have a look. At the time, I was still actively involved in Diamond Valley Baptist, which had been my home church for the past 11 years, and was quite happy there. Its ministry had been a blessing to me in innumerable ways, and I'd made some good friends there as well. I'd also spent four years leading a cell group.
Even so, as I no longer lived in the Diamond Valley community, having moved to Hadfield in January 2006, to some extent I felt detached from it. While I don't expect church to spoon feed me all of my needs, another factor was the lack of people there in my age bracket. Because of a lack of numbers, late last year the cell group I was leading ended up having to fold. Living alone for the first time made me realise how much I missed the community and social aspect of church life, which to me meant being able to pray for and minister to other Christians, serving alongside them in the community at large, or just going out and enjoying their company. Diamond Valley was doing all these things, and doing most of them well, but because I no longer lived nearby, to my mind it was no longer practical to participate in them.
I thought through and prayed about this question. Should I leave Diamond Valley to attend Crossway Moreland? Were my motives right? Single Christians often have ulterior motives for changing churches. While I don't deny that I hope and expect to be married one day, I put these questions before God and asked Him to make it clear to me, as far as possible, that it was the right step to take, and that my motives for wanting to change churches were honouring to Him. I kept attending Diamond Valley, while also visiting Crossway Moreland roughly twice a month, just to get a feel for the place, and to see if God wanted me there. There are other Baptist churches in Coburg, Brunswick, and Glenroy, all of which are doing great work, but I didn't look into any of them. For the time being, I'm living and working in the City of Moreland, so it made practical sense to be part of a church in this area as well.
I've met some quality Christian people there, who are passionate about their faith and living it out. They see the need for there to be a dynamic Christian presence in the City of Moreland, and are willing to do their part in seeing this vision become a reality. While I'm still settling in and getting to know people, I've tried to make a conscious effort to become actively involved in the life of this church. It's been great to be part of a viable cell group again, having people to share the journey with, and I've joined the church prayer team. This team meets every Sunday for an hour before the service to pray for different church and community needs.
This congregation is passionate, dynamic, and missional. My prayer is that God will use it to build His kingdom in this part of Melbourne. I've only lived in Moreland for one year, but have worked in it for the past four years, so I have at least some understanding of this community's spiritual climate. My impression is that there is a real need for this area to be reached with the Gospel, and Crossway Moreland will be part of this. Changing churches was a big step, but at this time, I have peace that this is where God wants me to be.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
